The flaw with gun control December 5, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Educational, Politics.Tags: gun control, guns, india, Mumbai, police, terrorists
add a comment
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/article14086308.ece
The argument to me comes down to the individual right to defend yourself and the governments right to control society even if it renders the individual defenseless. But the defenseless individual is easier to control so you see why gun control is an important issue for an fascist government.
Two quotes from the story that illustrate the flaw in the thinking of the gun control people. What happens if the police decide not to help you? Remember you have no legal recourse in the US for failure of the police to show up or defend you.
“Mr D’Souza had already seen two gunmen calmly stroll across the station concourse shooting both civilians and policemen, many of whom, he said, were armed but did not fire back.”
“But what angered Mr D’Souza almost as much were the masses of armed police hiding in the area who simply refused to shoot back. “There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything,” he said. “At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, ‘Shoot them, they’re sitting ducks!’ but they just didn’t shoot back.”
US Government December 5, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Educational, Politics.Tags: clowns, lawyers, United States, US Government, USA
add a comment
I hate to say it but the federal government is a bunch of clowns. They are making billion dollar balloon animals that will send our children into poverty and our grandchildren into slavery. As soon as they can get their big top to cover the the whole country it will be one big three ring lawyer circus. The only business that will succeed at that time will be the ones picking the pockets of the crowds, that will be a dangerous business since that is the job of the clowns and the three ring lawyers.
How to Convince Someone to Vote September 30, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Educational, Politics.Tags: election, vote
add a comment
In my opinion, if I’m not sure you are going to vote like me or you have no idea what is going on in the world, I’m not going to try to get you to vote! Please, if you don’t know what you are doing, don’t vote! First find out what is going on around you! Hitler was elected to save Germany from corrupt politicians. Mao had millions of supporters who did not figure out that he was a genocidal, fascist, dictator until it was too late! Encouraging the ignorant to vote is wrong! First they must know what is really going on.
http://www.wikihow.com/Convince-Someone-to-Vote
Voter turnout has been decreasing in established democracies around the world over the past 40 years.[1] So what can you do, as an individual, to reverse this trend? Social scientists say that there are four main reasons people vote (or don’t vote) and they all affect each other like this: PB + D > C.[2]
- P = probability that an individual’s vote will affect the outcome of an election
- B = perceived benefit of the outcome
- D = democracy, civic duty; immediate gratification from the act of voting itself
- C = time, effort, and financial cost involved in voting
Basically, all the pros (P, B, D) need to outweigh the cons (C). When you’re talking to someone who isn’t planning on voting, you have a much better chance of convincing them to cast their ballot by making a strong case for the pros, and minimizing the cons. Here’s a practical guide to shifting the decision in favor of voting.
DESPICABLE DC POLS’ MOST OUTRAGEOUS DEMAND YET September 30, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Politics.Tags: Americans, catastrophe, rescue, revolting, taxpayers, Wall Street
1 comment so far
This article is right on! The federal government caused this and they are the only solution? It was the same during 9/11, they let us down and they don’t pay for it, no, they get more money, and more power.
When times were good, people wanted to maximize profits and they did things that would have worked as long as the real estate market kept going up. As soon as there was a slight down turn the house of cards started falling.
MEMPHIS – Here’s why Americans are revolting over the Wall Street rescue plan.
It’s not that taxpayers refuse to dig deeper to avoid an even bigger catastrophe.
It’s that they’re all puking over the notion that it’s the same bums in Washington who caused the mess by allowing it to fester who are now demanding their money to fix it.
It’s like the criminal who breaks into your house, hurts himself, then sues you for damages.
The reason Americans endure their federal government is that it is so inept and useless that it has little bearing on their everyday lives.
But in an economic meltdown like this, people don’t have a choice but to feel the fallout of their government’s incompetence. This is especially true in important swing states like Michigan, Ohio, Florida and Wisconsin, where factories are shuttering and neighborhoods are going into foreclosure.
And when taxpayers are suddenly told that the government will clip them for an additional $700 billion to clean up a mess it made, voters tend not to forget.
What is truly staggering is that neither of the presidential candidates has effectively reached voters on this issue. That’s why they remain jumbled at 50-50 in the polls.
Obama’s envisioned “joint statement” last week and McCain’s sniveling attempts to skip Friday’s debate were silly political posturing, as if a little handholding would do any good.
All these people do is hold hands, and that’s why they’ve gotten us into such a crisis. When they’re not clutching hands with strangers in airport bathroom stalls, they’re clutching hands with people even worse – each other.
Or they’re playing footsie with lobbyists and selling off America’s future for a few bucks and a cushy job after they leave office.
Both sides are equally despicable.
Republicans have never met anything they’re not willing to sell – so long as it belongs to someone else.
And Democrats have never met anything they’re not willing to give away – again, so long as it belongs to someone else.
That someone else these last few years, of course, has been the American taxpayer. And any poor schlub who thought he was investing in a solid stock market.
churt@nypost.com
Muslim sues Tesco over alcohol September 29, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Politics.add a comment
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_3025368.html?menu=news.topheadlines
A Muslim said he is suing Tesco for religious discrimination because he was asked to handle crates of alcohol in a warehouse.
Mohammed Ahmed, 32, was employed at the supermarket giant’s Lichfield depot in September last year for a job that included transporting various goods on fork-lift trucks.
The Saudi Arabia national told a tribunal he had not been told when he started the job that he would be handling alcoholic drinks – a task he said was against his Islamic beliefs.
The situation came to a head in the run-up to Christmas last year, when more alcohol was ferried to the warehouse in preparation for the festive season.
Mr Ahmed, who moved to Derby in 2006, complained to Tesco in February, but claims he was treated unfairly as a result. After eight months working for the company, he left in protest.
The decision on his legal action, after a three-day employment tribunal held in Birmingham, is expected next week.
He said: “It’s in our religion that we are not allowed to handle alcohol. In the UK there’s equal opportunities that should protect me and my beliefs.
“I was asking for my rights. I am not saying I am a perfect person but there was a conflict with my beliefs.”
Tesco claimed Mr Ahmed was made aware at his induction that he would be handling alcohol, and that every effort was made to find him an alternative role in the warehouse. But the claimant, of Upper Dale Road, Normanton, claims he was victimised by managers because of his stance.
A Tesco spokesman said: “Cases like this are very rare as managers are trained to be culturally sensitive and have an ‘open door policy’ to staff for issues like this as everyone is welcome to work at Tesco.”
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson September 26, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Politics.Tags: 700 BILLION dollars, government, Henry, Paulson, Secretary, Treasury
add a comment
LEt me see if I understand this correctly? Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson two year ago left the company he worked for to work for the government. He now wants the government to give 700 BILLION dollars to him to give to the company he worked for, with no questions asked? AND he is only going to be in his current government job for four more months. Where do you think he is going when he leaves? That’s right, back to his old company.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is not pleading for the country, the economy, or the american people. He is trying to pull the greatest swindle in wall street history! If he does this there will be 1 or 2 billion dollars waiting for him when he gets back to his old job.
Nice work if you can get it.
Florida Congressman: Palin ‘Don’t Care Too Much What They Do With Jews and Blacks’ September 26, 2008
Posted by jerryh8391 in Politics.Tags: Alcee Hastings, Blacks, Jews, Palin
add a comment
All I can say is if Alcee Hastings was white and conservative she would be gone from congress!
Just imagine a white conservative saying at the panel discussion sponsored by the National Jewish Democratic Council, “the last man that was swept into office as the savior of a nation was Adolf Hitler and I don’t need to tell you how much he cared about Jews!”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/florida-congres.html
ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: Florida Democratic Congressman Alcee Hastings pointed to Sarah Palin on Wednesday to rally Jews to Obama.
“If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention,” said Hastings. “Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through.”
Hastings, who is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, made his comments in Washington, D.C., while participating in a panel discussion sponsored by the National Jewish Democratic Council.
Asked what the congressman meant, Hastings spokesman David Goldenberg told ABC News that he was trying to argue that Palin is an “extremely conservative woman who is out of touch with mainstream America.”
After saying that Palin “don’t care too much” about Jews and blacks, Hastings argued that African Americans and Jews should come together behind Obama because there are many issues on which they agree.
“Just like Jews, blacks care about affordable health care, energy independence, and the separation of church and state,” said Hastings. “And just like blacks, Jews care about equal pay for equal work, investment in alternative energy, and a woman’s right to choose.”
Asked about the Hastings criticism, Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella said, “We’re taking a pass.”
The Florida GOP responded to Wednesday’s panel discussion by calling on Obama to repudiate Hastings.
“Unless Senator Obama and the Florida Democrat Party believes that ‘anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks,’ both Obama and the FDP should immediately refute this ridiculous and divisive statement.”
When contacted by ABC News on Thursday afternoon, the Obama campaign had no response to the Florida GOP.